Featured post

“Sympathy” by Paul Lawrence Dunbar

The poem in this post may be familiar to most through Maya Angelou’s use of the repeating phrase as the title of her 1969 autobiography, I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings. It speaks to the power of Dunbar’s work that Angelou sensed the connection with this 1899 poem. The concept of freedom was more tangible for Dunbar than most. His parents were slaves who were only freed after the Civil War. But this is a poem that transcends his background and addresses the oppression of all types.

Dunbar’s wife, Alice, also a poet and future member of the Harlem Renaissance, said Dunbar was inspired to write this while working unhappily at the Library of Congress. He said the library’s iron shelves reminded him of a bird cage and working in the sweltering summer heat of the building made him long to be outside.

Reading it with this wider perspective does not dilute its power, but it does offer a different view of it.


Sympathy
By Paul Laurence Dunbar

I know what the caged bird feels, alas!
      When the sun is bright on the upland slopes;
      When the wind stirs soft through the springing grass,
And the river flows like a stream of glass;
      When the first bird sings and the first bud opes,
And the faint perfume from its chalice steals –
I know what the caged bird feels!

I know why the caged bird beats his wing
      Till its blood is red on the cruel bars;
      For he must fly back to his perch and cling
When he fain would be on the bough a-swing;
      And a pain still throbs in the old, old scars
And they pulse again with a keener sting –
I know why he beats his wing!

I know why the caged bird sings, ah me,
      When his wing is bruised and his bosom sore, –
      When he beats his bars and he would be free;
It is not a carol of joy or glee,
      But a prayer that he sends from his heart’s deep core,
But a plea, that upward to Heaven he flings –
I know why the caged bird sings!


In the first stanza, we get a gentle introduction to the topic as we hear of the bucolic scene viewed by the writer. But in the second stanza Dunbar delivers the blows with the blood “red on the cruel bars” and “a pain still throbs in the old, old scars.” The imagery is searing and he forces us to grapple with the idea that is not a new desire, but an old one that has left scars. This is a bird that either refuses to give up or simply cannot give up.

In the final stanza, we learn that bird song is not one of “joy or glee” but a prayer that “upward to Heaven he flings.” The word “fling” carries so much meaning in this context. When we “fling” something we throw it hard and carelessly, often on impulse. The prayer of Dunbar’s bird is a prayer of anger and bitterness.

So, yes, it is a poem on freedom, whether it be from the library stacks or more importantly, from the oppression of others. Dunbar’s poem shows how oppression can be bloody and cruel, whether metaphorically or physically, and the one seeking freedom does so with bitterness and anger. There is no polite call out to God from Dunbar, but a prayer of anger hurled at God. Oppression does not create pacifists.

On the analysis side, Dunbar uses three stanzas with a ABAABCC rhyme scheme. The lines are written tetrameter (four feet) except for the last line of each stanza which is a trimeter. Form serves a purpose and here it helps create a musical reading, reflecting the bird’s song. In addition, form is a canvas and Dunbar fills his canvas with strong alliteration (“beats his bars”). He uses rhyme and rhythm that readers of his time will be familiar with, but he uses it with content they would not expect. He has written a lyric poem as the bird stands in for Dunbar’s thoughts.

Featured post

“Biscuit” by Jane Kenyon

One writer I always want to spend more time delving into is Jane Kenyon. The Michigan-born poet garnered attention as an undergrad at the Univ. of Michigan and published four collections before cancer took her life at the age of 47.

Kenyon appeals to me because of her clear, even stark, language and her ability to prod the reader into thought. Her Christian faith often comes into play and it is a faith she takes seriously, eschewing easy solutions to difficult challenges. The poem here is a perfect example.


Biscuit
By Jane Kenyon

The dog has cleaned his bowl
and his reward is a biscuit,
which I put in his mouth
like a priest offering the host.

I can’t bear that trusting face!
He asks for bread, expects
bread, and I in my power
might have given him a stone.


So simple and yet offering so much. The part that jumps out to me is the part that much of the poetry world is either ignorant of or simply ignores (and the fact that those words share the same etymology — ignorare –should not be overlooked) and that is the Christian references. I love the world of poetry, but I am often frustrated by the inability of that world to address the Christian faith. In discussing Kenyon, the Poetry Foundation and the American Academy of Poets avoid the topic altogether, while Wikipedia relegates her faith conversations to her essays. Yet her poems are filled with her Christian faith, as pointed out in an essay by John Timmerman, author of a Kenyon biography.

In this poem, Kenyon is clearly referencing Matthew 7:9 where Jesus asks “Which of you, if your son asks for bread, will give him a stone?” It is part of a larger passage in which Jesus is sharing how God will take care of his people. Kenyon puts herself in the God role, or at least as a priest (God’s representative), as her dog counts on her to take care of him. It is an acknowledgment of her power and her responsibility. The dog depends on her and offers unabashed worship. This is probably why so many of us like dogs!

We can leave the poem there but I don’t think Kenyon wants us to stop at the literal. What she is also quietly raising is our relationship with God, a God on whom we may depend and worship. But turning the viewpoint, she puts us in the position of power and shows the responsibility that comes with such power.

This would be a great poem for medical ethics class as doctors and scientists are often accused of “playing God.” When they are in a position of life or death, of making a choice, do they understand the difference between bread and a stone? In a novel I was reading recently a doctor has a close friend who is dying and he challenges that friend’s doctor on whether this is palliative care presented as healing care? If so, was this bread or a stone (well, the author didn’t word it that way, but the idea is the same).

Do we nourish or starve those to whom we are responsible? There is a Kenyon thought worth spending some time on.

Featured post

“Prayer on a Morning My Car Wouldn’t Start” by Jack Ridl

My inaugural poem is from a teacher and friend who has had an incredible impact on the poetry world. While an outstanding poet, he clearly relishes helping others become great poets. More than 85 of his former students are published authors, and nine of his students appeared in “25 under 25,” in blind judging, edited by Naomi Shihab Nye (including my oldest son! Not that I’m proud or anything). To say Jack is a great writer and even better teacher does not diminish his writing, it raises the level of his teaching. Jack (I should say Ridl, but, I just can’t), is retired from official teaching, and he is still helping others succeed.

His own poems are a joy. Insightful, accessible, often funny, sometimes heartstopping. The selection here is from The Same Ghost, a 1984 collection. If Jack ever decides to put together a “Selected Poems” collection, I doubt this poem will make it. Not because it shouldn’t, but I don’t think it is among his “greatest hits.” But sometimes, the B-side of a record is our favorite.

Prayer on a Morning My Car Wouldn’t Start
By Jack Ridl

I sit behind the wheel
And finger the keys like a rosary.
Surely there is some prayer
That can move pistons.
If spirits slaughter germs,
Or bring about a sudden burst
Of hope or courage, even love,
Why not something simple, something
Closer to expedience? Why not dispatch
One lonely angel to caress my carburetor,
Fix my fan belt, or unclog my fuel line?
Just one greasy-winged mechanic,
Inept at saving souls, but damned
Good at getting me on my way.


There is so much to love about this poem but I’ll focus on the imagery. I’ve read a lot of poems in my many years, but “finger the keys like a rosary” is one poetic line that comes to me often, including when my car will not start in our Michigan winters. It is the subtle movement of the fingers over the familiarity of rosary beads coupled with a quick plea to God. It is seeking comfort, of gently sharing love through touch, in the hope of something more. You give first and hope for a response.

Of course, there is the “greasy-winged mechanic,” the lonely angel, that he seeks. And spirits that slaughter germs. Jack creates images that are both funny and poignant. Painters use paints to create images — poets use words. And, for those of us lucky to know Jack, we know he truly welcomes the lonely angels who cannot save souls but are “damned” good at something else. Jack populates his poetry with a place where all are welcome and everybody is of worth, even if the world does not recognize it yet.

And then he goes straight at us with:

Or bring about a sudden burst
Of hope or courage, even love,

Because sometimes we cannot tell where our sudden “hope or courage, even love” comes from. I see much of Jack’s style captured in that “even love,” dropping the most important concept as an aside. Jack probably shrugs his shoulders as he reads it, making it jump out all the more for not being featured.


You can learn more about Jack by visiting his website. He does a weekly video on a variety of topics, does readings when invited, and offers a wonderful workshop on “How To Read a Poem.” You can also learn about the visiting writers series at Hope College that Jack and his wife, Julie, created. After he retired the series was named after him: Jack Ridl Visiting Writers Series.